Judul : A GOOD DAY TO DIE HARD (2013) REVIEW
link : A GOOD DAY TO DIE HARD (2013) REVIEW
A GOOD DAY TO DIE HARD (2013) REVIEW
Good day to die hard
2013/97 min / John Moore / USA / Aspect ratio 1.85:1 / R
This is the Die Hard franchise. Fanbase, otherwise Bruce Willis wouldn't have to do anything and Box Office would use the franchise for Fox. Experience the adventure at McClane Cinema.
Part 5 belongs to John Moore. Fox's selection has a good reputation for John Moore and Max Payne and Max Payne in general was huge at the box office. Funnily enough it is part of 20th Century Fox's Max Payne genre. The electricity of an eccentric director to study a big project is no stranger to Fox. We talked about Tim Story and he had a big role and he had two critically released Fantastic Four films.
Not only behind the scenes commander, to lock down Die Hard 5, the Moon has put it in February, which is not quite an alias for a big blockbuster like this, chosen to rate term film franchises like Die Hard. Christ is enough? The film is only 97 minutes long - After Die Hard, this is a film with an aspect ratio of 1.85:1 - which will give the cinema screen a stiffer image. Rye's strangeness was also reflected in the misgivings that shook the optimism of the fans of Heavy Die Hard, bleek who were hard sahlong. And is this pessimism realized?
With a beating heart, the answer is yes.
Making a good action film is difficult because it makes imagination and accuracy in concocting a formula that has a healthy appearance, continuity between zerita and action can appear bright and make the excitement in the film maximized. Even if you use the winning formula , you will end up not being able to survive if the dose is mixed incorrectly. So that's what happened in Die Hard 5.
Sequel to the famous franchise, or cedar biased action film?
The prologue of Die Hard 5 is similar to that of the previous film: the basics are enough to provide an alibi over a string of impressive action scenes. John McClane (Bruce Willis) Rusland has not lost his popularity as Jack McClane (Jay Courtney). Bias aside, McClane has a chance. He is relentless in his feud with the terrorist Ruslan and once again has to get back into action, stopping everyone who thinks his miluk is a much more personal balsamut:
The main mistake that Kudana cantatu director, John Moore and naskhu writer, Skip Woods, make is that they are both ambitious in terms of the suspense of the action scenes. Die Hard, don't need to do anything, don't need to do anything, and you don't have more than one mark. But what if all of that was rumored in such a fierce duration, 97 minutes?
Yes, mixed.
This film took time to shoot. The plot jumps the van here and there in a hurry in order to be able to lead a large space for the execution of the action scenes. Yes, in short, Die Hard 5 Transformers, Total Recall Remake, Wrath of the Titans and others deliver movies and movies. Stupid action by Too kekemang, but not matched by good narration.
Narrative discusses that sin nahina the quality of the story. However, the way the filmmaker reads the story in such a simple way, in order to keep it interesting, to suppress the stabbing sweetening scenes. And this is not in Die Hard 5, which is very obvious kekkuda.
Not only that, the chemistry and character puns are not well developed due to the limited duration of the script. It's just that John McClane and Matthew Farrell make a couple or Die hard 4, but you don't have to do anything, but you don't have to do anything? There is no this Part in Die Hard 5.
A fiercely convincing antagonist or where the hellfire is so big that it makes McClane go crazy? And no.
Is it wild moves and unforgettable word rankings that you don't remember? Oh, and no. The Hard is just a 5 R movie, pale bland, but it's a blast anyway.
John McClane's character is feeling very good, causing irritation on the porch, Jack is shooting. And speaking of Jack, it seems that John Moore's character is more than just Jack.
 |
| The composition is bad. Made with an aspect ratio of 2.39:1, imagine that, the left and right sides will be more intact. Is the final cut of this film the result of cropping? |
Luxury cars
Unlucky, apart from all the craziness over the top, the action scenes that have cost billions of dollars worth of American dollars are complete - the blackout gives the crew a bounty for the crew with a very high degree of explosiveness and "behavior" spoils the film. But 2007's Die Hard 4, along with the 2007 film, if you announce the film, put it all on the screen with a simple, catchy and commanding formula - blast, shot - and it'll be great to do. it .
In simple terms, the aspect ratio is 1.85:1 memory Die Hard 5 ervaring unu can only be animated maximally on IMAX screens, because 1.85:1 case is small for security as well as action scenes for security as well as action scenes for impressive by. this. It's a fatal choice because Die Hard 5 feels less eerie and less impressive compared to similar blockbuster films (the same as in The Avengers), as long as four rate widths were previously filmed with (aspect ratio) with (let alone four). previously filmed width). Is it possible to open the carpet with separate Avatar and Skyfall? say
In total, after 5 Die Hard games. These movies are cool, yes, very cool, safe, yes, but there is no content, so unudable , and feels like any other big budget action film than the newest menu in the Die Hard franchise. So, for those of you who have smelled bad things about the film before its release, congratulations. Feeling pessimistic and has been realized.
That's the article A GOOD DAY TO DIE HARD (2013) REVIEW
That's it for the article A GOOD DAY TO DIE HARD (2013) REVIEW this time, hopefully can be useful for all of you. okay, see you in another article post.
You are now reading the article A GOOD DAY TO DIE HARD (2013) REVIEW with link address https://artidotum.blogspot.com/2022/09/a-good-day-to-die-hard-2013-review.html
0 Response to "A GOOD DAY TO DIE HARD (2013) REVIEW"
Posting Komentar